↓ Skip to main content

Explainer: what are antibodies and why are viruses like dengue worse the second time?

Overview of attention for news story in The Conversation
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
112 tweeters
facebook
11 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
Title
Explainer: what are antibodies and why are viruses like dengue worse the second time?
Published by
The Conversation, November 2016
Authors

Cameron Webb, Emily Johnston Flies

Abstract

Our immune system protects us but when it comes to some mosquito-borne disease, it can work against us. What are the implications for the development of a Zika virus vaccine?

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 112 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 142. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2020.
All research outputs
#226,511
of 21,944,731 outputs
Outputs from The Conversation
#29,522
of 154,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,557
of 316,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Conversation
#824
of 4,391 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,944,731 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 154,614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 89.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,391 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.