↓ Skip to main content

Explainer: what are antibodies and why are viruses like dengue worse the second time?

Overview of attention for news story in The Conversation
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
116 tweeters
facebook
11 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
Title
Explainer: what are antibodies and why are viruses like dengue worse the second time?
Published by
The Conversation, November 2016
Authors

Cameron Webb, Emily Johnston Flies

Abstract

Our immune system protects us but when it comes to some mosquito-borne disease, it can work against us. What are the implications for the development of a Zika virus vaccine?

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 116 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 133. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2018.
All research outputs
#97,562
of 12,486,089 outputs
Outputs from The Conversation
#10,264
of 70,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,276
of 281,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Conversation
#827
of 3,994 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,486,089 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 70,354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 71.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,994 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.