How a new test is revolutionising what we know about viruses in our midst
The Conversation, August 2015
We monitor mosquitoes to help predict and control virus outbreaks. And a new technique for collecting mosquito saliva from the field has made the process both more sensitive and inexpensive.
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||16||67%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||2||8%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||2||8%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2017.
All research outputs
of 23,705,225 outputs
Outputs from The Conversation
of 168,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 267,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Conversation
of 3,393 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,705,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 168,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 92.8. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,393 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.